Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 9(6): 615-623, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31173675

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is safe and effective but compliance is problematic. In this study we evaluated dropout and compliance among adults (≥20 years of age) and adolescents (<20 years of age) for Japanese cedar pollen extract (JCPE), an aqueous SLIT approved in 2014 in Japan. METHODS: Administrative claims data on 1236 Japanese patients, 846 adults (mean age, 43.0 years; 41.8% female) and 249 adolescents (mean age, 14.1 years; 36.6% female), with a JCPE prescription between October 2014 and June 2016 were reviewed. Adults and adolescents were divided according to the year they started SLIT (1- and 2-year cohorts) to calculate dropout and compliance and identify associated factors using multivariate Cox and linear regression models. RESULTS: In 1- and 2-year adult cohorts, dropout rates were 13.5% and 22.1% and compliance rates were 92.8% and 88.8%, respectively. Adolescents had higher dropout and lower compliance. Patients 40-59 years of age had a lower dropout risk than patients 20-29 years of age. Dropout hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) in 1- and 2-year cohorts were 0.26 (0.12-0.58) and 0.40 (0.17-0.93) in patients 40-49 years of age and 0.32 (0.14-0.75) and 0.35 (0.13-0.92) in patients 50-59 years of age, respectively. Younger age contributed to lower compliance in 1- and 2-year adult cohorts (p = 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). Systemic steroidal medication history and male gender were positively associated with compliance in adults but not in adolescents. CONCLUSION: High dropout rate was associated with younger generations. Compliance in adults, but not in adolescents, was associated with age, systemic steroidal medication history, and gender.


Assuntos
Cryptomeria/imunologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/psicologia , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Alérgenos/imunologia , Cryptomeria/química , Feminino , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pólen/química , Pólen/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/psicologia , Fatores de Risco
2.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 15(1): 189, 2017 Sep 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28962623

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Along with its high prevalence, the burden of allergic rhinitis rests upon the serious impact on quality of life of patients. Allergic rhinitis is associated with impairments in daily activities, work and school performance, and practical problems. Patients suffer from sleep disorders and emotional problems. Тhe advantages of sublingual immunotherapy on quality of life have only recently begun to emerge. The objective of this prospective real-life study was to evaluate the effect of a three-year course of sublingual immunotherapy with house dust mite (HDM) and grass pollen extracts on quality of life in adults with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: A total number of 191 adult patients [105 (54,979%) men; mean age 27.3 years (SD-6.14)] with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis and clinically relevant sensitization to house dust mites or grass pollen were prospectively evaluated in the course of management of their disease. Health-related quality of life was assessed by Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire at baseline and after three-year course of sublingual immunotherapy. RESULTS: The mean overall Qol score assessed at baseline and at the end of the third year of treatment decreased significantly in patients treated with HDM extract (from 2.95 to 0.76) as well as with Grass pollen extract (from 2.83 to 1.22) (р < 0.001). The improvements in treated with HDM extract were as followed: activities - 3.52 to 0.68; sleep- 2.48 to 0.31; general problems - 1.79 to 0.49; practical problems - 3.57 to 0.68; nasal symptoms - 3.91 to 0.74; eye symptoms - 2.92 to 0.39; emotions - 3.03 to 0.39. The improvements in grass pollen group were: activities - 3.68 to 1.69; sleep- 1.85 to 0.84; general problems - 1.74 to 0.97; practical problems - 3.52 to 1.37; nasal symptoms - 3.72 to 1.57; eye symptoms - 3.58 to 1.3; emotions - 2.48 to 1.19. CONCLUSION: Our study conducted in real life provided evidence that a three-year course of SLIT with HDM extract as well as with grass pollen extract significantly increased QoL in patients with allergic rhinitis.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Rinite Alérgica/terapia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/psicologia , Adulto , Alérgenos , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pólen , Estudos Prospectivos , Pyroglyphidae , Rinite Alérgica/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 7(5): 525-529, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182329

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For allergy immunotherapy to be effective, patient compliance is critical. However, aqueous sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) may be considered demanding for patients, requiring strict daily dosing and refilling of medication at regular intervals. In this study we sought to determine how patients perceive their own compliance with SLIT and identify barriers that may hinder compliance. METHODS: Using a retrospective review, 46 patients currently undergoing aqueous SLIT were identified to have less-than-excellent compliance based on frequency of clinic visits for SLIT refills. Twenty-eight of these patients completed a phone survey regarding symptom improvement, compliance, and barriers to care. In addition, 56 patients who withdrew from therapy before completion were polled about barriers to adherence. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients participating in the initial phone survey, 24 (86%) reported subjective improvement in symptoms on SLIT, despite less-than-excellent compliance. Nineteen (68%) of these patients perceived their own compliance to be excellent. Eighteen patients (65%) reported the inconvenience of scheduling and attending clinic appointments to be the main reason for noncompliance. The most common reasons for withdrawal from therapy were cost (27%), lack of effectiveness (25%), and difficulty with compliance (14%). CONCLUSION: The majority of aqueous SLIT patients perceived their compliance to be excellent, although, based on a previous study, these patients did not reach excellent compliance benchmarks. Inconvenience of clinic visits and cost of therapy were found to be the most common barriers to care. Despite what providers perceived as less-than-excellent compliance, 82% of patients reported symptom improvement with SLIT.


Assuntos
Cooperação do Paciente , Imunoterapia Sublingual , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Percepção , Imunoterapia Sublingual/economia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24358793

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) of dust mite drops to allergic rhinitis with mite allergy. The compliance and satisfaction of SLIT were also assessed. METHOD: One hundred and three patients of allergic rhinitis sensitive to dust mites were treated with SLIT for 6 months or more. The symptom questionnaire,including items on rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal obstruction, itchy nose, olfactory disturbance, eye discomfort and sleep disturbance were obtained before and 6 months after SLIT. The patients' satisfaction and adverse effects were also investigated. RESULT: Seventy-five of the 103 patients insist on SLIT for more than 6 months and completed the questionnaire. The duration of receiving SLIT was 9.8 months on average (range from 6 to 13 months). The satisfaction rate was 89.3%. The drop-out rate of SLIT was 31.0%. CONCLUSION: The subjective symptoms were improved with SLIT in patients with allergic rhinitis sensitive to dust mites. The drop out rate was high despite of the symptomatic improvement.


Assuntos
Cooperação do Paciente , Rinite Alérgica Perene/psicologia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Rinite Alérgica , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...